Categories
Roth IRA

Roth IRA Conversion – Analysis Paralysis? – Part 1 of 2

As is evident by the sheer number of blog posts to date about Roth IRA conversions – 33 – there’s a lot of things to consider when deciding whether a Roth IRA conversion makes sense for you. These include, but are not limited to, the following questions:

  • Should you do a Roth IRA conversion?
  • How much traditional IRA should be converted?
  • In which year(s) should a conversion be made?
  • Should you employ a multi-year conversion strategy, and, if so, what’s the best plan for you?
  • At which point during a particular year should a conversion be done?
  • Does it make sense to do multiple conversions in a single year?
  • Even though the income from a conversion in 2010 can be deferred to 2011 and 2012, should you do a conversion in 2010?
  • If you do a Roth IRA conversion in 2010, should you go with the default of reporting 50% of the conversion income on your 2011 tax returns and 50% on your 2012 returns or should you instead make an election to report 100% of your conversion income on your 2010 income tax returns?
  • Will your income tax rate be higher or lower than what it is now when you take distributions from your IRA accounts?
  • Which assets should be converted?
  • Should you set up multiple Roth IRA conversion investment accounts?
  • Is the current primary beneficiary of your traditional IRA a charity?
  • Are there retirement plans available for conversion other than active 401(k) plans?
  • What is the amount of projected income tax liability attributable to a potential conversion?
  • When will the tax liability attributable to the conversion need to be paid?
  • What sources of funds are available for payment of the tax liability?
  • Will withdrawals need to be made from the converted Roth IRA within five years of the conversion?
  • Do you have a life expectancy of five years or less with no living beneficiaries?
  • Do your itemized deductions and personal exemptions exceed your gross income such that you can convert a portion, or perhaps all, of your traditional IRA to a Roth IRA without incurring any income tax liability?
  • Do you own a rental property with a large passive activity loss carry forward that you can sell and do a Roth IRA conversion while incurring minimal or no income tax liability?
  • Is there a net operating loss that you can use to offset Roth IRA conversion income?
  • Is there a large charitable contribution available from the establishment of a charitable remainder trust that can be used to offset income from a Roth IRA conversion?
  • What is the basis of your traditional IRA, i.e., how much of your IRA has come from nondeductible IRA contributions or qualified retirement plan after-tax contributions?
  • Are you a surviving spouse in a low tax bracket who isn’t dependent on your IRA and one or more of your children are in a high income tax bracket?
  • What are the years and amounts of your projected required minimum distributions with and without a Roth IRA conversion?
  • What is the amount of projected taxable Social Security benefits that can be reduced by doing a Roth IRA conversion?
  • Do you have a SEP-IRA that can be converted to a Roth IRA?
  • Do you have a dormant 401(k) plan that can be converted?
  • How will a Roth IRA conversion affect financial aid qualification?
  • Will your Medicare Part B premium increase if you do a Roth IRA conversion?
  • If you do a Roth IRA conversion in 2010, will your Medicare Part B premium increase in more than one year?
  • What are the income tax consequences of a partial 72(t) Roth IRA conversion?
  • Should you not do a full Roth IRA conversion and instead leave funds in your traditional IRA for future nondeductible IRA contributions?

Feeling overwhelmed? Read Part 2 next week.

Categories
Roth IRA

Not Converting 100% of Your Traditional IRA’s? – Don’t Use All of Your Basis – Part 2

If you haven’t yet read last week’s post, I recommend that you do so before reading this one. Last week’s post listed three types of partial Roth IRA conversion scenarios and stated that the calculation of taxable gain in scenarios #2 and 3 can be problematic when basis exists if you’re not careful. This week’s posts illustrates each of the three scenarios.

Scenario #1 – Conversion of a Portion of a Single Traditional IRA Account

Suppose you own one traditional IRA account with a value of $120,000 and basis of $100,000. If you convert 50% of the account value, or $60,000 to a Roth IRA, you would use 50% of your basis, or $50,000 to calculate your taxable gain as follows: $60,000 – $50,000 = $10,000. Your remaining unused basis would be $50,000 (total basis of $100,000 less basis used of $50,000).

Scenario #2 – Conversion of a Portion of a Traditional IRA Account Where There are Multiple Traditional IRA Accounts

For this scenario, let’s assume that you own two traditional IRA accounts, consisting of a contributory and a SEP-IRA account with the following value and basis:

Account Type

Current Value

Basis

Contributory IRA

$100,000

$ 80,000

SEP-IRA

$200,000

 

$   0

 

TOTALS

$300,000

$ 80,000

Let’s assume that you convert 50%, or $100,000, of your SEP-IRA account to a Roth IRA. What is the amount of basis that you should use to calculate your taxable gain? Is it (a) $0 (50% of your SEP-IRA basis), or (b) $26,667 (1/3 of the total basis of both of your traditional IRA accounts)?

For those of you who guessed “b,” you are correct. Per last week’s post, whenever you calculate the taxable gain in connection with a partial Roth IRA conversion, you always need to include the basis from all of your traditional IRA accounts in your calculation. Since you are converting $100,000, or 1/3 of the total value of your traditional IRA accounts of $300,000, you need to use 1/3 of the total basis of your two accounts, or $26,667 ($80,000 divided by 3), resulting in a taxable gain of $73,333 ($100,000 – $26,667).

Scenario #3 – Conversion of 100% of One of Two or More Traditional IRA Accounts

Suppose in Scenario #2, instead of converting 50% of your SEP-IRA, you decide instead to convert 100% of your contributory IRA to a Roth IRA. Your contributory IRA account has a high basis since all of the contributions to it have been nondeductible vs. 100% deductibility for all of the contributions to your SEP-IRA, resulting in $0 basis. If you convert 100% of your contributory IRA to a Roth IRA, is the amount of basis used to calculate your taxable gain (a) $80,000 (100% of your contributory IRA basis), or (b) $26,667 (1/3 of the total basis of both of your traditional IRA accounts)?

Once again, “b” is correct. As with Scenario #2, you cannot simply use the basis from the traditional IRA account that you are converting to calculate your taxable gain. When there are two or more traditional IRA accounts, you must use a pro rata portion of your basis based on the relative values of the accounts that you are converting. Since you are converting $100,000, or 1/3 of the total value of your traditional IRA accounts of $300,000 you need to use 1/3 of the total basis of your two accounts, or $26,667 ($80,000 divided by 3), resulting in a taxable gain of $73,333 ($100,000 – $26,667).

In both Scenarios #2 and #3, after doing your Roth IRA conversion, you will have remaining basis of $53,333 (total basis before conversion of $80,000 less basis used for the conversion of $26,667).

Whenever you’re considering a Roth IRA conversion, you should always follow these four steps:

  1. Take an inventory of your various traditional IRA accounts to make sure that you’re including all of them in your calculations, even those you aren’t converting. Include all of your regular, or contributory IRA accounts, rollover IRA’s, SEP-IRA’s, and 72(t) IRA’s in your inventory.
  2. Make sure that you include the basis of all of your traditional IRA accounts in your calculations. Assuming that you have basis in at least one account, you should be able to locate this on Form 8606 – Nondeductible IRAs that is part of the tax filing for the most recent year that you made a nondeductible contribution to a traditional IRA, received a distribution from a traditional IRA or Roth IRA, or did a Roth IRA conversion.
  3. For partial conversions of a single traditional IRA, include a pro rata portion of the basis of the account based on the value of the account being converted relative to the total value of the account.
  4. Where there are multiple accounts and you are either converting a portion of one account or 100% of one of two or more accounts, include a pro rata portion of the basis of all accounts based on the value being converted relative to the total value of all accounts.

Above all, always remember that if you’re not converting 100% of your traditional IRA’s to a Roth IRA, don’t use all of your basis!

Categories
Roth IRA

Considering a Partial 72(t) Roth IRA Conversion? – Tread Lightly

The topic of this week’s blog post is one which, quite frankly, doesn’t pertain to very many people. You may be wondering why I’m writing about it if this is the case. Besides bringing the topic to the attention of those who may be affected by it, the main reason I’m writing this post is to provide interested readers with an example of a tax planning strategy that, while it doesn’t run afoul of any IRS rules, hasn’t been officially blessed by IRS.

As with many of my blog posts, this one was inspired by one of my clients. Mr. and Mrs. R., who are retired, aren’t yet receiving Social Security benefits, and derive the majority of their income from Mrs. R.’s 72(t) IRA and two nonqualified term certain annuities, a sizeable portion of which is nontaxable.

For those of you unfamiliar with a 72(t) IRA, some brief background. Generally you must wait until age 59-1/2 to begin taking distributions from an IRA, otherwise you’re subject to a 10% premature distribution penalty in addition to any income tax liability on your distributions. IRS has carved out an exception to this rule whereby you won’t be subject to the 10% penalty if you receive a series of substantially equal periodic payments, or “SOSEPP,” from your IRA for the greater of five years or until you reach 59-1/2. A 72(t) IRA account is a traditional or a Roth IRA account from which a SOSEPP is being made.

While Mrs. R has been taking her SOSEPP for five years, she’s still about a year and a half from turning 59-1/2. If Mrs. R. discontinues her SOSEPP before she turns 59-1/2, IRS would consider this to be a modification of her SOSEPP. As such, Mrs. R. would be subject to a 10% premature distribution penalty on future distributions from her IRA. Furthermore, the 10% penalty would also be applied retroactively to all of the distributions she has already taken from her 72(t) IRA.

In addition to their 72(t) IRA and nonqualified annuity distributions, my clients recently sold a rental property at a loss of $26,000. After reducing their adjusted gross income by various itemized deductions, they were projected to have a 2010 taxable loss of approximately $25,000. While this would result in no income tax liability, without further income tax planning, this would be a potentially wasted opportunity to recognize additional income and still pay no income taxes.

How could my clients recognize additional income? While they could potentially sell securities at a gain in their nonretirement account, this would be offset by a sizeable capital loss carryover. The other option was to do a Roth IRA conversion of Mrs. R.’s 72(t) IRA. IRS regulations permit a full Roth IRA conversion of a 72(t) IRA provided that the IRA owner continues his/her 72(t) distributions from the Roth IRA account following conversion.

Since the value of Mrs. R’s. 72(t) IRA was approximately $280,000, the potential income tax liability attributable to a full 2010 conversion of Mrs. R.’s 72(t) IRA to a Roth IRA couldn’t be justified based on my client’s current and projected multi-year income tax planning even with splitting the reporting of Mrs. R.’s conversion income between 2011 and 2012. I calculated that Mrs. R. could do a partial conversion of $50,000 without incurring any income tax liability due to my client’s ability to use a net operating loss carryover that they couldn’t otherwise use in 2010. Furthermore, Mrs. R.’s conversion amount could be as much as $70,000 before my client’s marginal income tax rate would exceed 15%.

Since IRS has endorsed the full conversion of a 72(t) IRA to a Roth IRA, it would seem that there should be no issue with a partial conversion so long as the 72(t) payments continue following the conversion. Logically, the post-conversion 72(t) payment amount should be paid from both the original 72(t) IRA and the new Roth IRA accounts based on the allocation of the relative values of the two accounts. The problem is that IRS has provided no guidance on partial Roth IRA conversions of 72(t) IRA accounts, including the allocation of post-conversion 72(t) payment amounts.

Given this situation, while it isn’t logical, IRS could potentially challenge a partial Roth IRA conversion of a 72(t) IRA. If IRS were to prevail on this issue, as previously stated, future, as well as retroactive, 72(t) distributions would be assessed a 10% premature distribution penalty. IRS would also assess interest on any assessed penalties.

After consulting with Natalie Choate, a well-known attorney who specializes in estate planning for retirement benefits, I recommended to my clients that they consider doing a partial Roth IRA conversion of Mrs. R.’s 72(t) IRA in 2010, file a 2010 income tax extension application, and plan on recharacterizing, or undoing, Mrs. R.’s partial Roth IRA conversion by October 15, 2011, the extended due date of Mr. and Mrs. R.’s 2010 income tax returns, in the event that IRS doesn’t provide definitive guidance on partial Roth IRA conversions of 72(t) IRA’s by this date. (For an explanation of the recharacterization process, please see Recharacterization – Your Roth IRA Conversion Insurance Policy.)